JOCS

The aim of the Comprehensive Surgery is to publish original research articles of the highest scientific and clinical value at the international level in all surgical fields.

EndNote Style
Index
Review
Pioneering green surgery: exploring current positions, advances, challenges, and pragmatic solutions for resource-inadequate settings
Surgery is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, especially through anesthetic gases, energy use from machines, and disposable materials. In low and middle income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria with limited access to surgery, its environmental impact further challenges already strained systems. This review explores the feasibility, strategies, and future prospects of implementing green surgery in poor resource settings. It also highlights its role in promoting equity, reducing costs, and conserving the environment. A broad literature review was conducted using peer-reviewed articles, global health reports, and case studies. Databases i.e PUBMED, Google Scholar and Scopus were scoured for reliable studies, field reports and original manuscripts. Key tools such as the PIPES instrument and Green Surgery Checklist were analyzed for use in LMICs. Green surgical practices, which include reuse models, solar-powered theatres, digital health, and waste segregation, have been shown to reduce costs, improve outcomes, and cut emissions by up to 97%. The "green channel" model demonstrated reduced postoperative complications without compromising care. Tools like the PIPES assessment and 5Rs-based checklists support implementation. Climate-resilient infrastructure, ethical frameworks, and global collaborations, including WHO’s three-bin waste system, further strengthen sustainability in surgical care. Green surgery is both feasible and beneficial in LMICs. It aligns environmental goals with surgical equity, cost-effectiveness, and quality care. Embedding sustainable practices into health systems through innovation, policy, and global cooperation is essential for building climate-resilient surgical services and mitigating healthcare’s environmental footprint.


1. Kumar H, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee P, Banerjee S, Upadhyay P, Sanyal T. Green Surgery: Pioneering Sustainable Practices in Healthcare. In: Madhu NR, Sanyal T, Sen K, Ganguly B, Hansell RIC, eds. A Basic Overview of Environment and Sustainable Development. Vol 3. International Academic Publishing House; 2024:175-200.
2. Pichler PP, Jaccard IS, Weisz U, Weisz H. International comparison of health care carbon footprints. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14(6):064004. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab19e1
3. Tennison I, Roschnik S, Ashby B, et al. Health care’s response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. Lancet Planet Health. 2021;5(2):e84-e92. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0
4. NHS England and NHS Improvement. Delivering a ‘Net Zero’ National Health Service. NHS England and NHS Improvement; 2020. Accessed April 5, 2022.
5. MacNeill AJ, Lillywhite R, Brown CJ. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. Lancet Planet Health. 2017;1(9):e381-e388. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6
6. Ologunde R, Maruthappu M, Shanmugarajah K, Shalhoub J. Surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: burden and barriers. Int J Surg. 2014;12(8):858-863. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.009
7. Rizan C, Reed M, Bhutta MF. Environmental impact of personal protective equipment distributed for use by health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic. J R Soc Med. 2021;114(5):250-263. doi:10.1177/01410768211001583
8. Schecter WP, Adhikari S. Global surgery and poverty. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, et al, eds. Essential Surgery: Disease Control Priorities. 3rd ed. Vol 1. World Bank; 2015. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0346-8_ch20
9. McGain F, Naylor C. Environmental sustainability in hospitals: a systematic review and research agenda. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014; 19(4):245-252. doi:10.1177/1355819614534836
10. Sherman J, Le C, Lamers V, Eckelman M. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of anesthetic drugs. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1086-1090. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6940
11. Denny NA, Guyer JM, Schroeder DR, Marienau MS. Operating room waste reduction. AANA J. 2019;87(6):477-482.
12. Vozzola E, Overcash M, Griffing E. An environmental analysis of reusable and disposable surgical gowns. AORN J. 2020;111(3):315-325. doi:10.1002/aorn.12885
13. Stall NM, Kagoma YK, Bondy JN, Naudie D. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Can J Surg. 2013;56(2):97-102. doi:10.1503/cjs.015711
14. Meara JG, Greenberg SL. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery: Global Surgery 2030-evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Surgery. 2015;157(5):834-835. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.009
15. Centre for Sustainable Healthcare. Green Surgery Challenge 2021 Finalists Report. Centre for Sustainable Healthcare; 2022.
16. Bhutta M, Rizan C. The Green Surgery report: a guide to reducing the environmental impact of surgical care, but will it be implemented? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024;106(6):475-477. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2024.0005
17. Global Green and Healthy Hospitals. Case Studies on Sustainable Surgery in LMICs. Global Green and Healthy Hospitals; 2022.
18. Royal College of Surgeons of England. Sustainability in the Operating Theatre. Royal College of Surgeons of England.
19. Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Mishra A, et al. Gasless laparoscopy in rural India: registry outcomes and evaluation of the learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(11):8227-8235. doi:10.1007/s00464-023-10392-4
20. Olasehinde O, Owojuyigbe A, Adeyemo A, et al. Use of energy device in general surgical operations: impact on peri-operative outcomes. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):90. doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01540-z
21. Asfaw SH, Galway U, Hata T, Moyle J, Gordon IO. Surgery, anesthesia, and pathology: a practical primer on greening the delivery of surgical care. J Clim Chang Health. 2021;4:100076. doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100076
22. Mishra A, Bains L, Jesudin G, Aruparayil N, Singh RS. Evaluation of gasless laparoscopy as a tool for minimal access surgery in low- to middle-income countries: a phase II noninferiority randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;231(5):511-519. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.783
23. Lam K, Gadi N, Acharya A, Winter Beatty J, Darzi A, Purkayastha S. Interventions for sustainable surgery: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2023;109(5):1447-1458. doi:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000359
24. Sullivan GA, Petit HJ, Reiter AJ, et al. Environmental impact and cost savings of operating room quality improvement initiatives: a scoping review. J Am Coll Surg. 2023;236(2):411-423. doi:10.1097/XCS.0000000000000478
25. Eckelman M, Mosher M, Gonzalez A, Sherman J. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(5):1067-1072. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959
26. Kurowiak J, Klekiel T, Bedzinski R. Biodegradable polymers in biomedical applications: a review-developments, perspectives and future challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(23):16952. doi:10.3390/ijms242316952
27. Logan CD, Feinglass J, Halverson AL, et al. Rural-urban disparities in receipt of surgery for potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Res. 2023;283:1053-1063. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.097
28. Khan SZ, Lengyel CG. Challenges in the management of colorectal cancer in low- and middle-income countries. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2023;35:100705. doi:10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100705
29. Fransvea P, Fico V, Puccioni C, et al. Application of fluorescence-guided surgery in the acute care setting: a systematic literature review. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023;408(1):375. doi:10.1007/s00423-023-03109-7
30. Sutton PA, Van Dam MA, Cahill RA, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery: comprehensive review. BJS Open. 2023;7(3):zrad049. doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad049
31. Frija G, Salama DH, Kawooya MG, Allen B. A paradigm shift in point-of-care imaging in low-income and middle-income countries. eClin Med. 2023;62:102114. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102114
32. Wahl B, Cossy-Gantner A, Germann S, Schwalbe NR. Artificial Intelligence and global health: how can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings? BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(4):e000798. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000798
33. Ghomrawi HMK, Holl JL, Abdullah F. Telemedicine in surgery: beyond a pandemic adaptation. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(10):901-902. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.2052
34. Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB, Nikolian VC. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. mHealth. 2018;4:11. doi:10.21037/mhealth.2018.04.03
35. Ahmad MH, Pathak S, Clement KD, Aly EH. Meta-analysis of the use of sterilized mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in less economically developed countries. BJS Open. 2019;3(4):429-435. doi:10.1002/bjs5.50147
36. Chate NN, Motiram NS, Jogdand BM, Birajdar MD. Study of operative outcomes of hernioplasty using mosquito net mesh at a tertiary hospital. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28525. doi:10.7759/cureus.28525
37. Rasouli M, Goli R, Nokashti HH. Surgical debridement and maggot debridement therapy can survive patient with diabetic foot ulcer after foot trauma: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2024;121:109990. doi:10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109990
38. Hsia RY, Mbembati NA, Macfarlane S, Kruk ME. Access to emergency and surgical care in sub-Saharan Africa: the infrastructure gap. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(3):234-244. doi:10.1093/heapol/czr023
39. Ojo O, Waheed H. Sustainability challenges in medical equipment donations to low- and middle-income countries. Academia Engineering. 2024;1:2. doi:10.20935/AcadEng6260
40. Kruk ME, Wladis A, Mbembati N, et al. Human resource and funding constraints for essential surgery in district hospitals in Africa: a retrospective cross-sectional survey. PLoS Med. 2010;7(3):e1000242. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000242
41. Ozgediz D, Galukande M, Mabweijano J, et al. The neglect of the global surgical workforce: experience and evidence from Uganda. World J Surg. 2008;32(6):1208-1215. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9473-4
42. Ryan I, Shah KV, Barrero CE, et al. Task shifting and task sharing to strengthen the surgical workforce in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the existing literature. World J Surg. 2023;47(12):3070-3080. doi:10.1007/s00268-023-07197-w
43. Odekunle FF. Maternal mortality burden: the influence of socio-cultural factors. Int J Health Sci Res. 2016;6(12):316-324.
44. Raykar NP, Yorlets RR, Liu C, et al. The How Project: understanding contextual challenges to global surgical care provision in low-resource settings. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1(4):e000075. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000075
45. Juran S, Broer PN, Klug SJ, et al. Geospatial mapping of access to timely essential surgery in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(4):e000875. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000875
46. Gajewski J, Pittalis C, Borgstein E, et al. Critical shortage of capacity to deliver safe paediatric surgery in sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from 67 hospitals in Malawi, Zambia, and Tanzania. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1189676. doi:10.3389/fped.2023.1189676
47. Groen RS, Samai M, Petroze RT, et al. Pilot testing of a population-based surgical survey tool in Sierra Leone. World J Surg. 2012;36(4):771-774. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1448-9
48. Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG, et al. Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(6):e316-e323. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70115-4
49. Pittalis C, Brugha R, Crispino G, et al. Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries: protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:25. doi:10.1186/s40814-019-0409-6
50. Mitra S, Ashby J, Muhumuza A, et al. Surgathon: a new model for creating a surgical innovation ecosystem in low-resource settings. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(2):e002162. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002162
51. Kagoma YK, Stall N, Rubinstein E, Naudie D. People, planet and profits: the case for greening operating rooms. CMAJ. 2012;184(17):1905-1911. doi:10.1503/cmaj.112139
52. Aldiba MA, Jamali EM, Dighriri A, et al. Rationalisation of laboratory tests ordering and consumption at Armed Forces Hospital, Jazan. BMJ Open Qual. 2023;12(2):e002114. doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002114
53. Shaw A, Chan YY, Arora HC, et al. Streamlining surgical trays for common pediatric urology procedures: a quality improvement initiative. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(4):412.e1-412.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.06.023
54. Weiss A, Hollandsworth HM, Alseidi A, et al. Environmentalism in surgical practice. Curr Probl Surg. 2016;53(4):165-205. doi:10.1067/j.cpsurg.2016.02.001
55. Conrardy J, Hillanbrand M, Myers S, Nussbaum GF. Reducing medical waste. AORN J. 2010;91:711-721. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2009.12.029
56. McGain F, Jarosz KM, Nguyen MN, Bates S, O’Shea CJ. Auditing operating room recycling: a management case report. A A Case Rep. 2015;5(3):47-50. doi:10.1213/XAA.0000000000000097
57. Cunha MF, Pellino G. Environmental effects of surgical procedures and strategies for sustainable surgery. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 20(6):399-410. doi:10.1038/s41575-022-00716-5
58. Blue-Zone Technologies. Hospital Anesthetic Gas Discharges and the Environment: Prevent the Vent. Canadian Centre for Pollution Prevention; 2005.
59. Mac Quene T, Smith L, Odland ML, et al. Prioritising and mapping barriers to achieve equitable surgical care in South Africa: a multi-disciplinary stakeholder workshop. Glob Health Action. 2022;15(1):2067395. doi:10.1080/16549716.2022.2067395
60. Roa L, Velin L, Tudravu J, et al. Climate change: challenges and opportunities to scale up surgical, obstetric, and anaesthesia care globally. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(11):e538-e543. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30247-3
61. Nazir A, Ma X, Vervoort D. Environmentally sustainable surgical health systems: an analysis of policies, tools, and guidelines. Lancet Planet Health. 2023;7(7):e538-e539. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00124-9
62. Hoveling T, Nijdam AS, Monincx M, Faludi J, Bakker C. Circular economy for medical devices: barriers, opportunities and best practices from a design perspective. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2024;208:107719. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107719
63. Robinson P, Surendran K, Lim S, Robinson M. The carbon footprint of surgical operations: a systematic review update. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023;105(8):692-708. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2023.0057
64. Wang LP, Dong BX, Yin MM. A study of carbon footprint evaluation at PP-R pipe based on life cycle assessment. Adv Mater Res. 2014;998-999:1520-1523. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.998-999.1520
65. Gill SJ, Yates EM, Braun C, et al. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography for bowel anastomosis assessment in ovarian cancer surgery. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2025;35(10):102022. doi:10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102022
66. Tevlin R, Panton JA, Fox PM. Greening hand surgery: targeted measures to reduce waste in ambulatory trigger finger and carpal tunnel decompression. HAND. 2023;20(4):634-641. doi:10.1177/15589447231220412
67. Wang J, Sun X, Zhu YL. Effectiveness of surgical green channel for senile hip fractures. Chin J Gerontol. 2018;20:578-582.
68. Nunez JM, Nellermoe J, Davis A, et al. Establishing a baseline for surgical care in Mongolia: a situational analysis using the six indicators from the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):e059495. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051838
69. Markin A, Barbero R, Leow J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the PIPES tool: validation of a Surgical Capacity Index for use in resource-limited settings. World J Surg. 2014;38:2195-2199. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2522-2
70. Pegna V, Robb H, Hurst K, Chu J, Testa F, Beatty JW. SUS 3 the intercollegiate green theatre checklist. BJS. 2023;110(Suppl 6):znad241.010. doi:10.1093/bjs/znad241.010
71. Morgan R, Ensor T. The regulation of private hospitals in Asia. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014. doi:10.1002/hpm.2257
72. James PB, Wardle J, Steel A, Adams J. Traditional, complementary and alternative medicine use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(5):e000895. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000895
73. Batcup C, Breth-Petersen M, Dakin T, et al. Behavioural change interventions encouraging clinicians to reduce carbon emissions in clinical activity: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23:384. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09370-2
74. Georgieva K, Gaspar V, Pazarbasioglu C. Poor and vulnerable countries need support to adapt to climate change. International Monetary Fund; 2022.
75. Sustainable Energy for All. Powering Healthcare: Market Assessment and Roadmap for Healthcare Facilities in Rwanda. Sustainable Energy for All; 2023.
76. Boniol M, Kunjumen T, Nair TS, et al. The global health workforce stock and distribution in 2020 and 2030: a threat to equity and universal health coverage? BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(6):e009316. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009316
77. Scoones I, Stirling A, Abrol D, et al. Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2020;42:65-75.
78. Lewis D. Should we pay more attention to south-north learning? Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2017;41(4):327-331. doi:10.1080/23303131.2017.1366222
79. World Health Organization. Safe management of wastes from health-care activities: a summary. World Health Organization; 2017.
80. Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Centre for Sustainable Healthcare, UK Health Alliance on Climate Change. Green Surgery: Reducing the Environmental Impact of Surgical Care. Version 1.1. UK Health Alliance on Climate Change; 2023.
81. Haukoo T. Implication of green surgery approach in healthcare system and its effect on carbon footprint reduction in operating theatre. PMC. 2025.
82. Martins RS, Joseph EA, Tariq J, Aziz N, Fatimi SH. The environment under the knife: a review of current eco-surgical strategies and recommendations for Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2022;72(Suppl 1-2):S112-S117. doi:10.47391/JPMA.AKU-23
Volume 4, Issue 2, 2026
Page : 41-50
_Footer