1. Lai S, Jiao B, Diao T, et al. Optimal management of large proximal ureteral stones (>10 mm): a systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2020;80:205-217. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.025
2. Ordon M, Andonian S, Blew B, Schuler T, Chew B, Pace KT. CUA guideline: management of ureteral calculi. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(11-12): E837-E851. doi:10.5489/cuaj.3483
3. Bhanot R, Jones P, Somani B. Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of ureteric stones-state-of-the-art review. Res Rep Urol. 2021; 13:227-236. doi:10.2147/RRU.S311010
4. Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F, Preminger GM, Tiselius HG. Contemporary management of ureteral stones. Eur Urol. 2012;61(4):764-772. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.009
5. Cui X, Ji F, Yan H, et al. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. Urology. 2015;85(4):748-756. doi:10. 1016/j.urology.2014.11.041
6. Abedi AR, Razzaghi MR, Allameh F, Aliakbari F, FallahKarkan M, Ranjbar A. Pneumatic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy for ureteral stones. J Lasers Med Sci. 2018;9(4):233-236. doi:10.15171/jlms.2018.42
7. Young MJ, Pang KH, Elmussarah M, Hughes PF, Browning AJ, Symons SJ. Acute extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteric stones-7-years’ experience from a busy district general hospital. BJU Int. 2022; 130(5):655-661. doi:10.1111/bju.15820
8. Cho CO, Yu JH, Sung LH, Chung JY, Noh CH. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using pneumatic lithotripsy [lithoclast (R)] alone or in combination with ultrasonic lithotripsy. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(11):783-787. doi:10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.783
9. Nour HH, Kamel AI, Elmansy H, et al. Pneumatic vs laser lithotripsy for mid-ureteric stones: clinical and cost effectiveness results of a prospective trial in a developing country. Arab J Urol. 2020;18(3):181-186. doi:10.1080/2090598X.2020.1749800
10. Bahçeci T, Başer A. Comparison the efficacy of pneumatic and holmium laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral stones: a retrospective observational study. Pamukkale Med J. 2022;15(4):648-655. doi:10.31362/patd.1055563
11. İrer B, Şen V, Erbatu O, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripters used in the ureterorenoscopic treatment of proximal ureter stones, a multi-center study of society of urological surgery aegean study group. J Urol Surg. 2018;5(3):158-163. doi:10.4274/jus.2143
12. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol. 2009;55(5):1190-1196. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019
13. Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001;40(4):362-371. doi:10.1159/000049803
14. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2418-2434. doi:10. 1016/j.juro.2007.09.107
15. Krambeck AE, Murat FJ, Gettman MT, Chow GK, Patterson DE, Segura JW. The evolution of ureteroscopy: a modern single-institution series. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(4):468-473. doi:10.4065/81.4.468
16. Günlüsoy B, Arslan M, Değirmenci T, Nergiz N, Minareci S, Ayder AR. Değişik yerleşimli üreter taşlarının üreteroskopik tedavisinde farklı litotripsi yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. Türk Ürol Derg. 2006;32(2): 234-239.
17. Wu CF, Shee JJ, Lin WY, Lin CL, Chen CS. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones. J Urol. 2004;172(5 Pt 1):1899-1902. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000142848. 43880.b3
18. Bahçeci T, Kızılay F, Çal AÇ, Şimşir A. Comparison of shockwave lithotripsy and laser ureterolithotripsy for ureteral stones. J Urol Surg. 2021;8(3):167-172. doi:10.4274/jus.galenos.2021.2021.0006
19. Mustafa G, Mahar NA, Qureshi HH, Mustafa M, Fayaz M, Hassan AS. Comparison of outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with ureteroscopic lasertripsy for management of proximal ureteral stones. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2024;34(1):101-104. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2024. 01.101
20. Eisner BH, Kurtz MP, Dretler SP. Ureteroscopy for the management of stone disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7(1):40-45. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2009.233
21. Leone NT, Garcia-Roig M, Bagley DH. Changing trends in the use of ureteroscopic instruments from 1996 to 2008. J Endourol. 2010;24(3): 361-365. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0222
22. Alenezi H, Denstedt JD. Flexible ureteroscopy: technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis. Asian J Urol. 2015;2(3):133-141. doi:10.1016/j.ajur.2015.06. 002
23. Kartal I, Cakici MC, Selmi V, Sari S, Ozdemir H, Ersoy H. Retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of stones in horseshoe kidney; what are the advantages and disadvantages compared to each other? Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):156-162. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1906
24. Teichman JM. Laser lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12(4):305-309. doi:10.1097/00042307-200207000-00008
25. Tran T, Pareek G. Selecting the appropriate treatment modality for ureteral calculi. ureteral stone management: a practical approach. Springer; 2014:41-62. doi:10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z
26. Wolf JS, Jr., Carroll PR, Stoller ML. Cost-effectiveness v patient preference in the choice of treatment for distal ureteral calculi: a literature-based decision analysis. J Endourol. 1995;9(3):243-248. doi:10. 1089/end.1995.9.243
27. Gerhard RS, Shrewsberry A, Solomon T, et al. Ureteroscopy versus shock wave lithotripsy: factors influencing patient treatment preferences. Urol Pract. 2016;3(6):423-429. doi:10.1016/j.urpr.2015.11.001
28. Giulioni C, Castellani D, Somani BK, et al. The efficacy of retrograde intra-renal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: results from 2946 patients. World J Urol. 2023;41(5):1407-1413. doi:10.1007/s00345-023-04363-6
29. Mazzucchi E, Berto FCG, Denstedt J, et al. Treatment of renal lower pole stones: an update. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(1):165-174. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.1023
30. Eisner BH, Reese A, Sheth S, Stoller ML. Ureteral stone location at emergency room presentation with colic. J Urol. 2009;182(1):165-168. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.131
31. Mustafa M, Al Zabadi H, Mansour S, Nabulsi A. Endoscopic management of upper and lower ureteric stones using pneumatic lithotripter: a retrospective medical records review. Res Rep Urol. 2023; 15:77-83. doi:10.2147/RRU.S392881
32. Binbay M, Tepeler A, Singh A, et al. Evaluation of pneumatic versus holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted ureteral stones.Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43(4):989-995. doi:10.1007/s11255-011-9951-8
33. Naqvi SA, Khaliq M, Zafar MN, Rizvi SA. Treatment of ureteric stones. Comparison of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy. Br J Urol. 1994;74(6):694-698. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07108.x
34. Scarpa RM, De Lisa A, Porru D, Usai E. Holmium: YAG laser ureterolithotripsy. Eur Urol. 1999;35(3):233-238. doi:10.1159/000019852
35. Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. 2002;167(5):1972-1976.
36. Bader MJ, Sroka R, Gratzke C, et al. Laser therapy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: indications and management. Eur Urol. 2009;56(1):65-71. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.012
37. Xiao K, Zhou L, Zhu S, Lin L, Di X, Li H. Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Low intermediate or high: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2023;10:1063159. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1063159
38. Ghalayini IF, Al-Ghazo MA, Khader YS. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction. Int Braz J Urol. 2006;32(6):656-664. doi:10.1590/s1677-55382006000600006
39. Leveillee RJ, Lobik L. Intracorporeal lithotripsy: which modality is best? Curr Opin Urol. 2003;13(3):249-253. doi:10.1097/00042307-200305000-00014
40. Zheng W, Denstedt JD. Intracorporeal lithotripsy. Update on technology. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27(2):301-313. doi:10.1016/s0094-0143(05)70259-7