JOCS

The aim of the Comprehensive Surgery is to publish original research articles of the highest scientific and clinical value at the international level in all surgical fields. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Incidental gynecologic cancers in women who underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
Aims: Despite symptom inquiry and preoperative sampling are performed for endometrial, cervix and ovarian pathologies in the preoperative evaluation, it is not clear whether cancer will be detected in the surgical specimen of an asymptomatic patient for pelvic organ prolapse surgery. In our study, we aimed to investigate the incidental cancer rates in patients who underwent vaginal or abdominal surgery due to pelvic organ prolapse.
Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients who underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse at Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between 2019 and 2023 were included in the study. Patients who had diagnosis of cancer were preoperatively excluded from the study. Preoperative transvaginal ultrasound were made for all patients using sonography by 5 MHz probe, (Voluson E8, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) or MRI. Accompanying endometrial, myometrial and adnexial pathologies were recorded. Routine endometrial thickness at preoperative evaluation was saved. Type of the surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, complications and final pathology reports were recorded. Approval for this study was obtained from İstanbul Training and Resarch Hospital Education Planning and Coordination Department (Date 13.10.2023, Decision No. 277). This study had been performed in accordance with the ethical standards described in Declaration of Helsinki.
Results: 107 patients had surgery due to pelvic organ prolapse between between 2019 and 2023. Mean endometrial thickness before surgery was 4.72+-4.27 mm. After surgery, all of the hysterectomy +- salpingooferectomy specimen sent to pathology. In our study there was a statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative diagnosis of endometrial polyps as p:0.0001. Due to the fact that Pipel is more effective in postmenopausal patients, the false-negative rate of office endometrial sampling, and that the main evaluation should be endometrial sampling accompanied by hysteroscopy. We did not evaluate endometrium by hysteroscopy preoperatively, so endometrial polyps can be found incidentally. In our study there was no incidental diagnosis of cancer.
Conclusion: Despite the risk of incidental cancer detection is different and controversial in the literature, it was ultimately decided to send the hysterectomy material for routine pathological examination.


1. Lowder JL, Ghetti C, Nikolajski C, Oliphant SS, Zyczynski HM. Body image perceptions in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. 2011;204(5):441. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12. 024
2. Sung VW, Washington B, Raker CA. Costs of ambulatory care related to female pelvic floor disorders in the United States. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. 2010;202(5):483. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.015
3. Oliphant SS, Jones KA, Wang L, Bunker CH, Lowder JL. Trends over time with commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic inpatient procedures. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. 2010;116(4):926-931. doi:10.1097/AOG. 0b013e3181f38599
4. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. 2009;114(6):1278-1283. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96
5. Raglan O, Kalliala I, Markozannes G, et al. Risk factors for endometrial cancer: an umbrella review of the literature. <em>Int J Cancer</em>. 2019;145(7): 1719-1730. doi:10.1002/ijc.31961
6. Accessed https://seer.cancer.gov/registries/data.html.
7. Ferris JS, Prest MT, Hur C, et al. Trends in uterine cancer incidence in the United States: The contribution of age, period and cohort effects. <em>Gynecol Oncol</em>. 2024;187:151-162. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.04.026
8. La Vecchia C. Ovarian cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. <em>Eur J Cancer Prev</em>. 2017;26(1):55-62. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000217
9. Nicholson RC, Khunda A, Ballard P, Rees J, McCormick C. Prevalence of histological abnormalities in hysterectomy specimens performed for prolapse. A systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>Int Urogynecol J</em>. 2021; 32(12):3131-3141. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04858-z
10. Elbiaa AA, Abdelazim IA, Farghali MM, Hussain M, Omu AE. Unexpected premalignant gynecological lesions in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy for utero-vaginal prolapse. <em>Prz Menopauzalny</em>. 2015;14(3):188-191. doi:10.5114/pm.2015.54344
11. Kaur H, Qadri S, Nevill AM, Ewies AAA. The optimal endometrial thickness threshold for prediction of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women without bleeding remains uncertain-systematic review and meta-analysis. <em>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</em>. 2024;53(10):102831. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102831
12. Wang JH, Zhao J, Lin J. Opportunities and risk factors for premalignant and malignant transformation of endometrial polyps: management strategies. <em>J Minim Invasive Gynecol</em>. 2010;17(1):53-58. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2009.10.012
13. Gregoriou O, Konidaris S, Vrachnis N, et al. Clinical parameters linked with malignancy in endometrial polyps. <em>Climacteric</em>. 2009;12(5):454-458. doi:10.1080/13697130902912605
14. Baiocchi G, Manci N, Pazzaglia M, et al. Malignancy in endometrial polyps: a 12-year experience. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. 2009;201(5):462. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.055
15. Antunes A, Jr., Costa-Paiva L, Arthuso M, Costa JV, Pinto-Neto AM. Endometrial polyps in pre-and postmenopausal women: factors associated with malignancy. <em>Maturitas</em>. 2007;57(4):415-421. doi:10.1016/ j.maturitas.2007.04.010
Volume 2, Issue 4, 2024
Page : 93-96
_Footer