JOCS

The aim of the Comprehensive Surgery is to publish original research articles of the highest scientific and clinical value at the international level in all surgical fields. This journal is indexed by indices that are considered international scientific journal indices (DRJI, ESJI, OAJI, etc.). According to the current Associate Professorship criteria, it is within the scope of International Article 1-d. Each article published in this journal corresponds to 5 points.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
Comparison of early and late term results of onlay and sublay mesh approaches in open incisional hernia surgery
Aims: Despite the increase in minimally invasive techniques, open techniques continue to be frequently used in incisional hernia repairs. In open incisional hernia surgeries, onlay and sublay techniques are the most frequently preferred depending on the area where the mesh is placed. In this study, we aimed to compare these two techniques by analyzing perioperative findings.
Methods: Data from elective open incisional hernia surgeries (onlay and sublay) performed by the same surgical team in the general surgery clinic between 01.01.2023 and 31.12.2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Emergency surgeries, laparoscopic or combined surgeries, patients who did not undergo mesh repair, patients who received preoperative botulinum toxin due to “loss of domain”, patients with missing data, and patients who did not continue their follow-up were excluded from the study.
Results: The data of a total of 74 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in the study. Onlay procedure was performed in 53 (71%) patients and sublay procedure was performed in 21 (19%) patients with a retromuscular approach. No intraoperative complications were detected in any of the patients. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of female gender (p: 0.007), duration of surgery (p<0.001) and duration of hospital stay (p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of complications (p:0.42), unexpected re-admission (p:0.779) and six-month recurrence (p: 0.779).
Conclusion: Onlay or sublay techniques can be safely applied in open incisional hernia surgery because they have acceptable complication and recurrence rates. Surgical experience and patient factors are the main determinants of which technique to apply.


1. Fortelny RH, Andrade D, Schirren M, et al. Effects of the short stitch technique for midline abdominal closure on incisional hernia (ESTOIH): randomized clinical trial. <em>Br J Surg.</em> 2022;109(9):839-845. doi:10.1093/bjs/znac194
2. Pereira C, Gururaj S. Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh Repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review. <em>Cureus.</em> 2023;15(1):e34156. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34156
3. Kumar V, Rodrigues G, Ravi C, Kumar S. A comparative analysis on various techniques of incisional hernia repair-experience from a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. <em>Indian J Surg.</em> 2013;75(4): 271-273.
4. Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T, Cornish J, Harries R, Stimpson A. Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14 618 patients. <em>PLoS One</em>. 2015;10(9):e0138745. 10.1371/journal.pone.0138745
5. Kurzer M, Kark A, Selouk S, Belsham P. Open mesh repair of incisional hernia using a sublay technique: long-term follow up. <em>World J Surg.</em> 2008;32(1):31-36.
6. Kılavuz H, G&uuml;ng&ouml;r F, Demir M, Kurtuluş İ. Repair of recurrent umbilical hernia with Duramesh&trade;, a suturable mesh: Our first application experience. <em>Arch Curr Med Res.</em> 2024;5(2):97-99. doi:10. 47482/acmr.1469773
7. Sanders DL, Pawlak MM, Simons MP, et al. Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society. <em>Br J Surg.</em> 2023;110(12):1732-1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284
8. Acar T, Acar N, S&uuml;r, et al. The effects of operation technique on recurrence of incisional hernia repair. <em>Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul.</em> 2020; 54(1):23-28. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.23334
9. Basta MN, Kozak GM, Broach RB, et al. Can we predict incisional hernia? Development of a surgery-specific decision-support interface. <em>Ann Surg.</em> 2019;270(3):544-553. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003472
10. Hassan F, Gaurav K, Kumar K, et al. A Comparative study of elective sublay versus onlay repair for non-complex, small, and medium-size incisional hernia: post-operative complications in a tertiary hospital in Ranchi, India. <em>Cureus.</em> 2024;16(5):e59593. doi:10.7759/cureus.59593
11. Martins EF, Dal Vesco Neto M, Martins PK, et al. Onlay versus sublay technıques for ıncısıonal hernıa repaır: 30-day postoperatıve outcomes. <em>Arq Bras Cir Dig.</em> 2022;35:e1692. doi:10.1590/0102-672020220002e1692
12. Sevin&ccedil; B, Okuş A, Ay S, Aksoy N, Karahan &Ouml;. Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia. <em>Turk J Surg.</em> 2018;34(1):17-20. doi:10. 5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712
13. Ibrahim R, Abounozha S, Kheder A, Alshahri T. Incidence of seroma in sublay versus onlay mesh repair of incisional hernia. <em>Ann Med Surg (Lond).</em> 2021;61:155-157. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.029
14. Van den Dop LM, Sneiders D, Yurtkap Y, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement vs. primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): long-term outcomes of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. <em>Lancet Reg Health Eur.</em> 2023;36:100787. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100787
15. K&ouml;ckerling F. Onlay technique in incisional hernia repair-a systematic review. <em>Front Surg.</em> 2018;5:71. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00071
16. Demetrashvili Z, Pipia I, Loladze D, et al. Open retromuscular mesh repair versus onlay technique of incisional hernia: a randomized controlled trial. <em>Int J Surg.</em> 2017;37:65-70. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.12.008
17. Leithy M, Loulah M, Greida HA, Baker FA, Hayes AM. Sublay hernio plasty versus onlay hernioplasty in incisional hernia in diabetic patients. <em>Menoufia Med J.</em> 2014;27:353-358.
18. Timmermanns L, De Goede B, van Dijk SM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. <em>Am J Surg.</em> 2014;207(6):980-988. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.030
19. Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, Carbonell AM, et al. Drain placement does not increase infectious complications after retromuscular ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh: an AHSQC analysis. <em>J Gastrintest Surg.</em> 2017;21(12):2083-2089. doi:10.1007/s11605-017-36010
20. Andersen LP, Klein M, G&ouml;genur I, Rosenberg J. Long-term recurrence and complication rates after incisional hernia repair with the open onlay technique. <em>BMC Surg.</em> 2009;9:6. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-9-6
21. Venclauskas L, Maleckas A, Kiudelis M. One-year follow-up after incisional hernia treatment: results of a prospective randomized study. <em>Hernia.</em> 2010;14(6):575-582.
22. de Vries Reilingh TS, van Geldere D, Langenhorst B, et al. Repair of large midline incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh: comparison of three operative techniques. <em>Hernia.</em> 2004;8(1):56-59. doi:10.1007/s10029-003-0170-9
Volume 2, Issue 4, 2024
Page : 72-75
_Footer