JOCS

The aim of the Comprehensive Surgery is to publish original research articles of the highest scientific and clinical value at the international level in all surgical fields.

EndNote Style
Index
Original Article
The efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) applied under ultrasonography guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy operations
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of erector spinae block (ESPB) applied preoperatively under ultrasonography guidance in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) operations in terms of the intraoperative need for opioids, postoperative analgesia, and patient satisfaction.
Methods: Of 60 patients who were 18 to 65-year-old and evaluated as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk I-II-III were planned to undergo elective PNL. The patients were randomly separated into two groups as the Block group-administered ESPB under sedation in the preoperative period and the Control group-administered no ESPB. All the operations were performed under general anesthesia. The study data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U-test and the Independent Samples t-test.
Results: Demographic data of the patients were not different between the groups (p>0.05). Neither intraoperative opioids nor analgesics were required for any of the patients in the ESPB group whereas intraoperative opioids and analgesic drugs had to be administered to all of the patients in the control group (p<0.001). The postoperative patient satisfaction scores in the ESPB group were found statistically higher than that of the control group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The results demonstrated that ESPB applied preoperatively under USG guidance reduced the need for intraoperative opioids and postoperative analgesia in PNL operations. This, in turn, increased patient satisfaction by maintaining patient comfort after surgery.


1. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinaeplane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathicpain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621-627. doi:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451
2. Ueshima H, Hiroshi O. RETRACTED: Spread of local anestheticsolution in the erector spinae plane block [retracted in: J ClinAnesth. 2022 Sep;80:110834]. J Clin Anesth. 2018;45:23. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.12.007
3. Choi SW, Cho SJ, Moon HW, et al. Effect of intercostal nerve block andnephrostomy tract infiltration with ropivacaine on postoperative paincontrol after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective,randomized, and case-controlled trial. Urology. 2018;114:49-55.doi:10.1016/j.urology.2017.12.004
4. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Officeof the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy GlobalStudy: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. JEndourol. 2011;25(1):11-17. doi:10.1089/end.2010.0424
5. Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 guideline forthe management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2418-2434.doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.107
6. Gultekin MH, Erdogan A, Akyol F. Evaluation of the efficacy ofthe erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain in patientsundergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlledtrial. J Endourol. 2020;34(3):267-272. doi:10.1089/end.2019.0777
7. Ibrahim, M., Elnabtity, A.M. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae planeblock in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Anaesthesist. 2019;68:755-761doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00673-w
8. Vadivelu N, Mitra S, Schermer E, Kodumudi V, Kaye AD, Urman RD.Preventive analgesia for postoperative pain control: a broader concept.Local Reg Anesth. 2014;7:17-22. doi:10.2147/LRA.S62160
9. Rafiq S, Steinbr&uuml;chel DA, Wanscher MJ, et al. Multimodal analgesiaversus traditional opiate based analgesia after cardiac surgery,a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;9:52.doi:10.1186/1749-8090-9-52
10. Rosero EB, Joshi GP. Preemptive, preventive, multimodal analgesia:what do they really mean?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4 Suppl2):85S-93S. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000671
11. Aydin G, Aydin O. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided paravertebralblock in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medicina (Kaunas).2018;54(5):75. doi:10.3390/medicina54050075
12. Pehlivan SS, Gergin OO, Baydilli N, Ulgey A, Erkan I, BayramA. Effectiveness of erector spinae plane block in patients withpercutaneous nephrolithotomy. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25(2):192-196.doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_462_20
13. Chin KJ, Adhikary SD, Forero M. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block: Anew paradigm in regional anesthesia and analgesia. Curr AnesthesiolRep. 2019;9(3):271-280. doi: 10.1007/s40140-019-00333-0
14. Kot P, Rodriguez P, Granell M, et al. The erector spinae plane block: anarrative review. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(3):209-220. doi:10.4097/kja.d.19.00012
15. Zengin M, Sazak H, Baldemir R, et al. Comparison of analgesicefficacy of different local anesthetic volumes for erector spinae planeblock in thoracotomy patients; a prospective randomized trial. BMCAnesthesiol. 2023;23(1):42. doi:10.1186/s12871-023-02004-4
16. Aksu C, Kuş A, Y&ouml;r&uuml;koğlu HU, Tor Kılı&ccedil; C, G&uuml;rkan Y. Analgesic effectof the bi-level injection erector spinae plane block after breast surgery:A randomized controlled trial. İki seviye erekt&ouml;r spina plan bloğununmeme cerrahisi sonrası analjezik etkisi: Randomize kontroll&uuml; &ccedil;alışma.Agri. 2019;31(3):132-137. doi:10.14744/agri.2019.61687
17. G&uuml;rkan Y, Aksu C, Kuş A, Y&ouml;r&uuml;koğlu UH. Erector spinae plane blockand thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020;59:84-88.doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.06.036
18. Aydin G, Sahin AT, Gencay I, et al. Which is more effective forminimally invasive pectus repair: epidural or paravertebral block?.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(1):81-86. doi:10.1089/lap.2019.0403
Volume 1, Issue 2, 2023
Page : 34-39
_Footer